← Return to Blogs

Not All Phonics Apps Are Created Equal: New Research Highlights the “Needle in a Haystack” for Educators

Published by on Print print

In today’s digital-first classrooms, finding the right tools to support foundational literacy can feel like a daunting task. With over 9,000 apps on the market claiming to teach children how to read, how do you distinguish between a high-quality educational tool and a “gamified” distraction?

A world-first, systematic study recently published in the Early Childhood Education Journal has done the heavy lifting for us. Researchers Lisa Furlong, Tanya Serry and their team conducted a rigorous quality appraisal of 309 phonics and phonological awareness apps available in the Australian Google Play store and Apple App store.

The results are a wake-up call for educators: only 27.5% of the apps reviewed were recommended by expert reviewers.

The Reality of the “Educational” App Market

The study used the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) to assess apps across dimensions like engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information quality.

Crucially, the researchers found that consumer star ratings are often unreliable indicators of educational value. While an app might be highly rated by parents for its “fun” factor, it often lacks the evidence-based instructional principles required to actually improve literacy outcomes.

Key shortcomings identified in the majority of appraised apps included:

  • A Lack of Explicit Instruction: 81% of apps failed to provide clear, direct teaching or modelling of new concepts.
  • Inaccurate Modelling: Many apps contained phoneme pronunciation errors (like adding “schwas” to sounds, e.g., saying /buh/ instead of /b/).
  • Random Sequencing: Most apps lacked a logical, systematic scope and sequence, often introducing complex words before children had mastered the necessary prerequisite skills.
  • Poor Feedback: Immediate and corrective feedback was often missing or limited to simple “correct/incorrect” cues without explaining why a response was wrong.

PLD Listed in the Top 5 Recommended Apps

While the market is crowded with poor-quality options, the research highlighted a small group of “needles in the haystack” that align with Structured Synthetic Phonics (SSP) principles.

We are incredibly proud to share that PLD’s 2P Read 1d app was identified as one of the top-performing apps in this comprehensive study. In fact, our resources were featured within the top 5 recommended apps for phonics and phonological awareness instruction. (Find the complete list here.)

The researchers recommended these high-quality apps because they demonstrate:

  • Explicit teaching and modelling of key concepts.
  • Systematic and sequential instruction that builds in complexity.
  • High levels of interactivity with a focus on the phoneme level.
  • Application of knowledge and skills to decodable texts.
Explore PLD’s Apps

Why This Matters for Your Classroom

As educators, your time and budget are precious. This research underscores the importance of applying the same critical standards to digital apps as you would to traditional teaching resources.

Choosing an app isn’t just about keeping students quiet during independent work; it’s about ensuring they are receiving evidence-based practice that leads to orthographic mapping and fluent reading.

Why PLD Apps Stand Out

Beyond 2P Read, PLD’s full suite – including Reading Race and Spell Star – continues to deliver apps that are:

  • Authored by a Speech Pathologist: Developed by Diana Rigg to focus on phonics and phonological awareness.
  • Aligned with Research-Backed Principles: Built around Structured Synthetic Phonics (SSP) with sequenced instruction, blending, and correct phonic sounds.
  • Targeted to Key Skills: Reading Race develops early decoding; Spell Star focuses on spelling; both support early literacy with multiple practice opportunities.

PLD apps are designed to enhance learning, not just entertain, and complement evidence-based instruction in classrooms and school-wide programs.

Ready to bring evidence-based apps into your classroom? Explore our award-winning app series here.

Next Steps for Educators

  • Review Your Current Tools: Check if the apps you use provide explicit modelling or if they allow students to “guess” their way through.
  • Prioritise Systematicity: Look for apps that follow a clear scope and sequence rather than teaching in alphabetical order.
  • Download the Full Guide: For a detailed look at how to evaluate literacy apps, you can access the full research paper here.

References

Furlong, L., Serry, T., Erickson, S. et al. Finding the Needle in the Haystack: A Quality Appraisal of Mobile Applications for Foundational Literacy Skills. Early Childhood Educ J (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-02066-8 

← Return to Blogs