← Return to Blogs

PLD Improves Indigenous Literacy in Remote Community Area: Speech Pathology Australia Case Study

In my time travelling to different schools and conducting seminars with educators,  I often highlight the fact that attendance at school is important and essential for children to learn. However it’s important to point out that on its own, attendance will not raise literacy standards.

This is particularly the case for remote schools and those rural schools with a high indigenous population students. The majority of the indigenous students entering these schools present with a complex skill profile. These students typically enter schools having had a history of ear infections. In addition their oral language skills in first language (or languages) and English typically is below the level required. This is to support a smooth transition into literacy and curriculum learning.

A recent case study was completed by Speech Pathology Australia (SPA) in association with the Independent Schools of Western Australia (AISWA). It looked at the literacy gap between Indigenous and Non Indigenous students. In their research they concluded that focusing on oral language and the sounds that make up words, students were taught how to hear the  different sounds in words. Looking at how these sounds are represented in written form. This aligns closely with PLD’s approach to literacy. You can read the entire case study here.

Intervention Process

NT Yr2to6 Image

As a speech pathologist and a teacher I can see the intervention process is relatively straightforward. This intervention requires teaching staff to gain specialist training.  Programs are needed to develop the prerequisite skills for literacy acquisition and enhanced curriculum participation.

In this particular case study school, I worked closely with the teaching and Aboriginal Education Assistants(AEA)  support staff. When the PLD program was first introduced, 100 per cent of the junior primary students were assessed as being ‘non-readers’. At the end of the first year of the program, this was reduced to 64 per cent. Also, only 25 per cent of the primary students were reading within one year of their reading age before the program. This changed to 86 per cent after the first year.

With each trip I take to Western Australian and Northern Territory communities I further glimpse the issues. I often talk with teachers and educators who are also concerned about how to deal with these issues. They want to ensure the literacy of indigenous children so they can succeed.  This is to maintain a similar level to children across Australia, and not just in remote areas.

I am certain it is the quality of the programs and the quality of the school’s literacy plan and delivery of the literacy program that makes the difference. I am continuing to look at ways to incorporate PLD’s programs into remote indigenous areas.

← Return to Blogs